Johnston v. Deaton
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Malone v. Malone (Ohio Ct. App. 1963)
- Hack v. Keller (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
- Reel v. Reel (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
- Queen City Savings & Loan Co. v. Foley (Ohio 1960)
- Mitchell v. Crain (Ohio Ct. App. 1958)
- Beaver, Gdn. v. Bates (Ohio Ct. App. 1958)
- Zywiczynski v. Zywiczynski (Ohio Ct. App. 1943)
- Hackett v. Linch (Wyo. 1940)
- Sellman v. Schaaf (Ohio Ct. App. 1969)
- Hersch v. Home Sav & Loan Co. (Ohio Ct. App. 1938)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Epitomized Opinion
The plaintiff began action to partition of two 80 acre tracts of land between herself and defendant. The commissioners reported against division, and appraised each tract separately. The Common Pleas overruled plaintiff’s objection to the rule of the commissioners, and ordered the premises sold. The Court of Appeals held “no appeal lies from the order under consideration.” The Supreme Court held:
1. That it has recently decided, in 104 OS., 188, that the term “judgment” appearing in Sec. 6, Art. IV, Ohio Const., as amended in 1912, is no longer limited to the restricted meaning given it formerly by the legislature in 11582 GC., but it now comprehends all decrees and final orders rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction which determine the rights of the parties affected thereby.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.