Ohio Supreme Court, 1922

Stockum v. State

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 26, 1922 · Clark, Hough, Jones, Marshall, Matthias, Robinson, Wanamaker

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 72; 139 N.E. 855; 106 Ohio St. 249; 1922 Ohio LEXIS 242

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Webster v. State Ex Rel. Altick (Ohio 1935)
Munic. Court v. State, Ex Rel. (Ohio 1933)
Municipal Court v. State ex rel. Platter (Ohio 1933)
State v. Kassay (Ohio 1932)
Ingham v. State (Ohio Ct. App. 1929)
Sheward v. State (Ohio 1927)
Stewart v. State (Ohio Ct. App. 1932)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

CLARK, J.:

1. The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States does not control nor is it a limitation upon the criminal procedure -of the several states. (Prescott v. State, 19 Ohio St., 184, approved and followed.)

2. Imprisonment “at hard labor” of a person convicted of an offense under Section 1654, General Code, is lawful and does not violate any provision of the federal or state constitution.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Hough, Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.