Ohio Supreme Court, 1922

Kiefer v. State

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 26, 1922 · Clark, Hough, Jones, Marshall, Matthias, Robinson, Wanamaker

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 72; 139 N.E. 852; 106 Ohio St. 285; 1922 Ohio LEXIS 246

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow v. Ohio Dept. of Edn. (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2018)
City of Toledo v. Thompson-Bean (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
Obetz v. McClain (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2021)
State v. Craig (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2020)
State v. New (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
State v. Davidson (Ohio Ct. App. 1998)
State v. Loless (Ohio Ct. App. 1986)
State ex rel. Gault v. Medina Cty. Court of Common Pleas Clerk (Ohio 2025)
Adamson v. Ohio State Med. Bd., Unpublished Decision (9-30-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
State v. Glover (Ohio Ct. App. 1984)
State v. Dorso (Ohio 1983)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, J.:

A charge in an affidavit, “did then and there solicit an order for intoxicating liquors,” does not charge the offense to “solicit . . . any intoxicating liquors,” as defined in Section 3 (6212-15, General Code) of “An Act to prohibit the liquor traffic and to provide for the administration and enforcement of such prohibition.” (108 O. L., pt. 2, 1182.)

Judgment reversed.

Marshall, C. J., Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones, Matthias and Clark, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.