Ohio Supreme Court, 1922

Aldrich v. City of Youngstown

Aldrich v. City of Youngstown
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 29, 1922 · Clark, Hough, Jones, Marshall, Matthias, Robinson, Wanamaker
1 Ohio Law. Abs. 80; 27 A.L.R. 1497; 106 Ohio St. 342; 140 N.E. 164; 1922 Ohio LEXIS 223
Aldrich v. City of Youngstown

Cases that cite this one

46 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

JONES, J.:

1. The creation and maintenance of a police department by a muunicipality are done in the exercise of its governmental functions. The performance of an act by an official of such department is not the performance of a ministerial act for which a municipality becomes liable under the maxim, respondeat superior.

2. A municipal corporation is not, in the absence of a statutory provision, liable in damages to one injured for the negligent acts of its police department, or any of its members.

(Fowler, Admx., v. City of Cleveland, 100 Ohio St., 158, overruled; Frederick, Admx., v. City of Columbus, 58, Ohio St., 538, and Wheeler v. City of Cincinnati, 19 Ohio St., 19, followed and approved.)

Judgment affirmed and judgment for defendant in error.

Marshall, C. J., Hough, Robinson, Matthias and Clark, JJ., concur. Wanamaker, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.