Ohio Supreme Court, 1922

State ex rel. Hickenlooper v. Beaman

State ex rel. Hickenlooper v. Beaman
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 11, 1922 · Hough, Johnson, Jones, Marshall, Matthias, Robinson, Wanamaker
105 Ohio St. (N.S.) 652

State ex rel. Hickenlooper v. Beaman

Opinion of the Court

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the same hereby are affirmed; this court being unanijudgments of the said court of appeals he, and the *653mously of the opinion and finding that the statute involved in these eases has no application to the facts here involved because of the provisions of Section 20, Article II, of the Constitution of Ohio.

Judgments affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Johnson, Hough, Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.