State ex rel. Hickenlooper v. Beaman

Ohio Supreme Court July 11, 1922

State ex rel. Hickenlooper v. Beaman, 105 Ohio St. (N.S.) 652 (Ohio 1922)

Hough, Johnson, Jones, Marshall, Matthias, Robinson, Wanamaker

Opinion of the Court

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the same hereby are affirmed; this court being unanijudgments of the said court of appeals he, and the *653mously of the opinion and finding that the statute involved in these eases has no application to the facts here involved because of the provisions of Section 20, Article II, of the Constitution of Ohio.

Judgments affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Johnson, Hough, Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name: The State, ex rel. Hickenlooper v. Beaman, Auditor The State, ex rel. Marx v. Beaman, Auditor The State, ex rel. Gusweiler v. Beaman, Auditor The State, ex rel. Fox v. Beaman, Auditor The State, ex rel. Spiegel v. Beaman, Auditor The State, ex rel. Yeatman v. Beaman, Auditor The State, ex rel. Alexander v. Beaman, Auditor
Status: Published
Syllabus: Superior and municipal courts of Cincinnati — Compensation of judges — Section 2252, General Code (108 O. L., pt. 2, 1301)— Section 1558-4, General Code (108 O. h., pt. 2, 1123) — Increase during term of office — Section 20, Article II, Constitution.