Where the plaintiffs in an action against a municipality to recover damages for personal injuries caused by the negligence of a servant of the municipality fails to offer any evidence tending to prove that the servant at the time was engaged in the performance of a proprietary function of the mmu-nicipality, as distniguished from a governmental function delegated by the sovereign state, a motion to direct a verdict at the close of the plaintiff’s case should be sustained.

Judgment reversed and judgment for plaintiff in error.