Adams v. Hollow Rock Mining & Transportation Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Adams v. Hollow Rock Mining & Transportation Co., 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 500 (Ohio 1923)
Allen, Day, Jones, Marshall, Matthias, Robinson, Wanamaker
Adams v. Hollow Rock Mining & Transportation Co.
Opinion of the Court
1. The filing by defendant of a general demurrei to a petition, in which demurrer he fails to make anj reservation as to the court’s jurisdiction over him is an entry of appearance and a waiver of his righ to object on the ground of jurisdiction over his per son.
2. A rule of the Court of Appeals requiring brief: to be' filed in error proceedings within a reasonabk time is a valid exercise of the power conferred upoi that court, and a dismissal of such proceedings ■ error for failure to file such brief for a period of foil months after a petition in error is filed does not con stitute an abuse of the discretion of the court in tha b.ehalf.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- James L. Adams v. The Hollow Rock Mining and Transportation Company
- Status
- Published