Ohio Supreme Court, 1923

Yutze v. Copeland

Yutze v. Copeland
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 26, 1923 · Allen, Day, Jones, Marshall, Matthias, Robinson, Wanamaker
2 Ohio Law. Abs. 6

Yutze v. Copeland

Opinion of the Court

JONES, J.

A writ of habeas corpus will not lie to test the constitutionality, of a statute or ordinance, in favor of one who has been convicted, where the criminal court wherein conviction was obtained had jurisdiction or power to determine the question of constitutionality. In such case the writ cannot be made a substitute for proceedings in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Wanamaker, Robinson, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.