State ex rel. Highway Construction Co. v. Baker
State ex rel. Highway Construction Co. v. Baker
Opinion of the Court
The petitions in these cases allege that the relator has entered into a contract with the
“That such estimate so made and so certified to the defendant herein as aforesaid, was a legal estimate, and was made, certified, and presented to such department of finance in strict accordance with the laws of the state of Ohio relating thereto.
“Relator avers that said defendant refused and neglected to approve such estimate or to certify the same to the auditor of the state of Ohio or allow the same to be filed with the auditor of the state of Ohio with his approval, and that such refusal was without right, reason, or any justification in law.”
Without discussion of the allegations of the petitions in detail, it is sufficient to say that enough appeal’s therein to show that the relator is without legal remedy, and that, if the well-pleaded allegations of the petitions are true, which the demurrers admit, the relator is entitled to the relief prayed for.
Many legal questions have been argued in these cases which were also argued in disposing of a demurrer in State, ex rel., v. Herrick, ante, 611, 140 N. E., 314, decided concurrently herewith, and the opinion in that case therefore has application to the present controversies.
Demurrers overruledJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.