Industrial Commission v. Vail
Cases that cite this one
19 later published cases cite this decision.
- Philadelphia Nat. Bank v. Raff (6th Cir. 1935)
- State ex rel. Slaughter v. Industrial Commission (Ohio 1937)
- King v. State Industrial Accident Commission (Or. 1957)
- Stough v. Industrial Commission (Ohio 1944)
- State Ex Rel. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Atkinson (Ohio 1941)
- Derewicki v. Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. (Ohio Ct. App. 1939)
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm. (Ohio 1939)
- State ex rel. Longano v. Industrial Commission (Ohio 1939)
- Industrial Commission v. Marsh (Ohio 1929)
- W. S. Tyler Co. v. Rebic (Ohio 1928)
- Jasionowski v. Industrial Commission (Ohio Ct. App. 1926)
- State Ex Rel. City of Toledo v. Weiler (Ohio 1925)
- Kossick v. Sharon Steel Hoop Co. (Ohio 1925)
- Boord v. Industrial Commission (Ohio Ct. App. 1945)
- McHale v. Industrial Commission (Ohio Ct. App. 1940)
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm. (Ohio 1934)
- State ex rel. Podley v. Industrial Commission (Ohio 1934)
- W. S. Tyler Co. v. Rebic (Ohio Ct. App. 1927)
- Caton v. Def. Screw Machine Co. (Ohio Ct. App. 1925)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
An application for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Gen. Code, Sections 1465-37 to 1465-108) filed with the Industrial Commission of Ohio prior to August 16, 1921, the date the amendment to Section 1465-90, General Code, became effective, is a proceeding, within the provisions of Section 26, General Code, which ripens into an action upon an appeal from a denial of such claim by the Industrial Com *305 mission, and the amendment is not applicable in the trial of such action.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed in both cases.
Judgments affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.