Ohio Supreme Court, 1924

State ex rel. Crawford v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 29, 1924 · Allen, Jones, Marshall, Matthias, Wanamaker

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 308; 143 N.E. 574; 110 Ohio St. 271; 1924 Ohio LEXIS 354

Cases that cite this one

16 later published cases cite this decision.

Suez Co. v. Young (Ohio Ct. App. 1963)
American Rolling Mill Co. v. Earnhart (Ohio Ct. App. 1932)
State Ex Rel. Estate of McKenney v. Industrial Commission (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
Pardiew v. Keller (Ohio Ct. App. 1969)
Goodman v. Gerstle (Ohio 1952)
State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Comm. (Ohio 1945)
State ex rel. New Idea, Inc. v. Blake (Ohio 1945)
Ballard v. Ohio Edison Co. (Ohio 1938)
Ballard, Admr. v. Ohio Edison Co. (Ohio Ct. App. 1937)
Ayers v. Parker (District Court, D. Maryland 1936)
Heckert v. Heckert (Ohio Ct. App. 1936)
Philadelphia Nat. Bank v. Raff (6th Cir. 1935)
State ex rel. Boswell v. Industrial Commission (Ohio 1932)
Corbett v. Corbett (Ohio 1930)
State ex rel. Hollo v. Industrial Commission (Ohio 1929)
Popovic v. Popovic (Ohio Ct. App. 1975)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MARSHALL, C. J.

By virtue of the provisions of Section 35 of Article II of the Ohio' Constitution, limiting the benefits of workmen’s compensation insurance to workmen and their dependents, and by virtue of the provisions of Section 1465-72, General Code, limiting payment to injured employes and dependents of killed employes, and by virtue of Section 1465-88, General Code, providing that compensation before payment shall be exempt from claims of creditors and be payable only to employes or their dependents, and by virtue of Section 1465-86, General Code, conferring continuing jurisdiction upon the Industrial Commission and power to make modification or change of its findings and orders, an award of compensation from the state insurance fund, under Section 1465-82, General Code, to a wife living with her husband at the time of his death, is revocable, so that in' the event of the death of such dependent, before all the installment payments of such award have been made, her personal representative is not entitled to receive th'e unpaid installments. (State ex rel Munding, Admr., v. Industrial Commission, 92 Ohio St. 434, overruled.)

Writ denied,

Jones, Matthias and Allen, JJ., concur. Wanamaker, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.