Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1925

State Ex Rel. Universal Realty Co. v. Brown

State Ex Rel. Universal Realty Co. v. Brown
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 16, 1925 · Marshall, Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade, Robinson
150 N.E. 755; 113 Ohio St. 698; 113 Ohio St. (N.S.) 698; 1925 Ohio LEXIS 254 (North Eastern Reporter)

State Ex Rel. Universal Realty Co. v. Brown

Opinion of the Court

The court finds that the plaintiff is not entitled to a writ of mandamus as prayed for in the petition, for the reason that the transaction is one in which other persons are concerned and other interests involved, and the relief sought cannot be afforded by a writ of mandamus.

Writ denied.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑