Estabrook v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court
Estabrook v. Public Utilities Commission, 3 Ohio Law. Abs. 268 (Ohio 1925)
Allen, Day, Jones, Kinkade, Marshall, Matthias, Robinson

Estabrook v. Public Utilities Commission

Opinion of the Court

ROBINSON, J.

A certificate of public convenience and necessity is not an asset with which a receiver of public convenience and necessity upon af-charged, or which he may sell and convert into an asset, nor is the right to a certificate of a motor transportation company can be fidavit under Section 614-87, General Code, an *269asset of a receiver of a motor transportation company, which but for the appointment of the receiver would have been entitled to such a certificate, nor can the same be sold or transferred and converted into an asset.

Order affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Hubert A. Estabrook, Receiver v. The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
Status
Published