Ohio Supreme Court, 1925

Estabrook v. Public Utilities Commission

Estabrook v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1925 · Allen, Day, Jones, Kinkade, Marshall, Matthias, Robinson
3 Ohio Law. Abs. 268

Estabrook v. Public Utilities Commission

Opinion of the Court

ROBINSON, J.

A certificate of public convenience and necessity is not an asset with which a receiver of public convenience and necessity upon af-charged, or which he may sell and convert into an asset, nor is the right to a certificate of a motor transportation company can be fidavit under Section 614-87, General Code, an *269asset of a receiver of a motor transportation company, which but for the appointment of the receiver would have been entitled to such a certificate, nor can the same be sold or transferred and converted into an asset.

Order affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.