Cleveland-Akron Bag Co. v. Jaite

Ohio Supreme Court
Cleveland-Akron Bag Co. v. Jaite, 3 Ohio Law. Abs. 330 (Ohio 1925)
Allen, Day, Jones, Kinkade, Mathias

Cleveland-Akron Bag Co. v. Jaite

Opinion of the Court

JONES, J.

1 1.. If proof óf a material-fact-necessary |o -establish :negligence rests" upon- an 'infererice 'only, the inference "must' be' á' frátíoriál orik -such' as could- be? reasonably1 arrived at from ’the-facts and' CirCuffiétances-?Testified íó.V/-,n

. ,'.2-. Tbe .mbre fact that a juror, while on, }jjr ■way 'to the jury bori,;. asked, to .¿fee the ..injured JW1 J of/j* ’¡. ^brch/ljad.'(haertbfai-e been éXhibited tb 'the jury, and .the character of the ;miumes /thereto' My/testified .not! of itself' eatfsté^for á.inistó&l;.

Judgment affirmed.

Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur. Mathias, J., concurs in the judgment.

Reference

Full Case Name
The Cleveland-Akron Bag Co. v. Earle E. Jaite, an infant, etc.
Status
Published