State ex rel. Davidson v. Industrial Comission

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Davidson v. Industrial Comission, 3 Ohio Law. Abs. 333 (Ohio 1925)
Jones, Kinkade, Matthias, Robinson

State ex rel. Davidson v. Industrial Comission

Opinion of the Court

ROBINSON, J.

1. There is no duty specially enjoined by law on the Industrial Commission to rehear an application for compensation after an appeal, from its adverse ruling, to the court of common pleas has been prosecuted and heard.

2. The Industrial Commission hás no jurisdiction over applications for compensation that have been appealed to the court of common’pleas, while such appeal is pending, and ■no'- jurisdiction after judgment, except to carry the judgment into execution.

:ipémurrer-.-.sustained..

Jones, Matthias., and Kinkade, JJ., concur,: .

Reference

Full Case Name
The State, ex rel. Caroline Davidson v. Industrial Comission
Status
Published