Ohio Supreme Court, 1925

State ex rel. Davidson v. Industrial Comission

State ex rel. Davidson v. Industrial Comission
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1925 · Jones, Kinkade, Matthias, Robinson
3 Ohio Law. Abs. 333

State ex rel. Davidson v. Industrial Comission

Opinion of the Court

ROBINSON, J.

1. There is no duty specially enjoined by law on the Industrial Commission to rehear an application for compensation after an appeal, from its adverse ruling, to the court of common pleas has been prosecuted and heard.

2. The Industrial Commission hás no jurisdiction over applications for compensation that have been appealed to the court of common’pleas, while such appeal is pending, and ■no'- jurisdiction after judgment, except to carry the judgment into execution.

:ipémurrer-.-.sustained..

Jones, Matthias., and Kinkade, JJ., concur,: .

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.