Ohio Supreme Court, 1926

State Ex Rel. Crabbe v. Exhibitors' & Breeders' Ass'n

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 11, 1926 · Marshall, Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade, Robinson

151 N.E. 768; 115 Ohio St. 34; 115 Ohio St. (N.S.) 34; 1926 Ohio LEXIS 321 (North Eastern Reporter)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Stanton v. Frankel Bros. Realty Co. (Ohio 1927)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

This matter is submitted upon a demurrer to the petition in quo warranto, and the petition is almost identical in its allegations with the petition in State ex rel. v. Thistledown Jockey Club, No. 19549, 114 Ohio St., 582, 151 N. E., 709, recently decided by this court. The demurrer challenges the sufficiency of the petition on the question of the acts of the defendant amounting to violation of gambling laws, and also whether quo warranto will lie in such eases. The petition very fully and with some prolixity states a violation of the laws of the state against gambling, and the demurrer admits the truth of those allegations, and the demurrer must therefore be overruled upon the authority of State ex rel. v. Thistledown Jockey Club, No. 19549, supra.

Demurrer overruled.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.