Ohio Supreme Court, 1926

Toledo, Fostoria & Findlay Railway Co. v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1926 · Allen, Day, Jones, Kinkade, Marshall, Matthias, Robinson, Syllabus

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 113

Opinion of the Court

DAY, J.

Unless new_ facts or conditions, or a subsequent change in the law, have intrvened, whereby the legal relations of parties, fixed by a prior judgment, are changed, such former judgment constitutes a bar to a subsequent action.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, CJ., Jones, Matthias, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur. Robinson, J., concurs in the syllabus, but not in the judgment.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.