Realty Holding Inc. v. State ex Bell

Ohio Supreme Court
Realty Holding Inc. v. State ex Bell, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 756 (Ohio 1926)

Realty Holding Inc. v. State ex Bell

Opinion of the Court

The Holding Co. in the Supreme Court con*757tends that the Court of Appeals has no power upon a quo warranto, to oust corporation from doing business in state because it permitted gambling, or to grant temporary restraining order forbidding same company to conduct business in furtherance of its unlawful conduct.

Attorneys — Joseph Heintzman; and Pogue, Hoffheimer & Pogue for Company; Chas. S. Bell for State ex; all of Cincinnati.

Reference

Full Case Name
REALTY HOLDING INC. et v. STATE ex BELL
Status
Published