Frank v. Auto Body Co.
Frank v. Auto Body Co.
5 Ohio Law. Abs. 75
Opinion of the Court
Frank contends in the Supreme Court that even if he is president of a company he is entitled to recover for injurits received while running a circular saw which was improperly guarded and such judgment should not be reversed because contrary to law upon ground that it was not his duty to operate the saw.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.