Ohio Supreme Court, 1927

Link v. Hill

Link v. Hill
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 14, 1927 · Allen, Day, Jones, Kinkade, Lobinson, Marshall, Matthias
5 Ohio Law. Abs. 826

Link v. Hill

Opinion of the Court

LOBINSON, J.

The implication that.an agreement to repay upon the sale of certain property is an agreement to repay within a reasonable time, without the sale of the property, does not obtain where the facts and circumstances relative to the entering into such agreement preclude the existence of any such intention on the part of the contracting parties at such time.

(Marshall, CJ., Allen, Kinkade and Matthias, JJ., concur. Day and Jones, JJ., dissent.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.