Ohio Supreme Court, 1929

Seibert v. Herring

Seibert v. Herring
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 5, 1929 · Allen, Day, From, Jones, Kinkade, Marshall, Matthias, Robinson, Syllabus
7 Ohio Law. Abs. 367

Seibert v. Herring

Opinion of the Court

Syllabus by

ALLEN, J

PLEADINGS — Trial (590 E3h)

(440 D) The admission arising from a demurrer is not to be regarded as evidence or considered as equivalent to evidence. It merely denies the legal sufficiency of the facts alleged, and hence such facts áre admitted solely for the purpose of testing their sufficiency in law.

Marshall, CJ, Kinkade, Matthias and, Day, JJ, concur. Robinson and' Jones, JJ, concur in the syllabus, but dissent from the judgment.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.