Ohio Supreme Court, 1929

State ex rel. Huntington Nat Bank v. Putnam

State ex rel. Huntington Nat Bank v. Putnam
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 12, 1929 · Day, Jones, Kinkade, Marshall, Matthias
7 Ohio Law. Abs. 378

State ex rel. Huntington Nat Bank v. Putnam

Opinion of the Court

Syllabus by

MATTHIAS, J.

MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — Actions (10 M2b)

(360 B) Where notes of a municipality have been duly issued and sold in anticipation of the levy of special assessments for the issuance of bonds, pursuant to the authority conferred by 3914 GC, the remedy of mandamus is available to the holder of such notes, where the municipal authorities have refused to levy such special assessment or to issue and sell bonds for the purpose' of procuring funds to pay said notes ,and the interest thereon.

Marshall, ,-CJ,. Kinkade, Jones and Day, JJ, ‘concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.