State ex rel. Hollo v. Indust Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court October 23, 1929

State ex rel. Hollo v. Indust Comm., 7 Ohio Law. Abs. 639 (Ohio 1929)

Day, Jones, Kinkade, Marshall, Matthias, Robinson

Opinion of the Court

Syllabus by

DAY, J.

EMPLOYER & EMPLOYE

(250 lb) While an award made under the Industrial Commission Act for an injury . to an employe and an additional award made for violation of a specific requirement causing such injury, are separate and distinct awards, yet, growing out of the same probative facts and affecting the same parties, they are to be regarded *640as so interdependent that the Commission, under the discretion given it by 1465-86 GC, may make ■ such modifications or changes with reference to either of said awards as in its opinion are justified.

Marshall, CJ., Kinkade and Matthias, JJ., concur. Robinson and Jones, JJ., not participating.

Reference

Full Case Name: STATE ex Hollo v. INDUST COMM.
Status: Published