George Ast Candy Co. v. Kling

Ohio Supreme Court
George Ast Candy Co. v. Kling, 7 Ohio Law. Abs. 703 (Ohio 1929)
Allen, Day, Kinkade, Marshall, Matthias, Robinson

George Ast Candy Co. v. Kling

Opinion of the Court

Syllabus by

MARSHALL, CJ.

AUTOMOBILES

(50 Re) Section 6310-28a GC, does not confer an absolute and unqualified right of way upon the driver of a motor “vehicle approaching from the right,” neither does it excuse the driver of such vehicle from the common law duty to exercise ordinary care. Heidle v. Baldwin, 118 Ohio St., 375, approved and followed.

Kinkade, Robinson, Matthias and Allen, JJ., concur. Robinson and Day, JJ., dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name
GEORGE AST CANDY CO v. KLING
Status
Published