George Ast Candy Co. v. Kling
George Ast Candy Co. v. Kling
7 Ohio Law. Abs. 703
George Ast Candy Co. v. Kling
Opinion of the Court
Syllabus by
AUTOMOBILES
(50 Re) Section 6310-28a GC, does not confer an absolute and unqualified right of way upon the driver of a motor “vehicle approaching from the right,” neither does it excuse the driver of such vehicle from the common law duty to exercise ordinary care. Heidle v. Baldwin, 118 Ohio St., 375, approved and followed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.