Ohio Supreme Court, 1930

Ex Parte Justes

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 29, 1930 · Marshall, Kinkade, Robinson, Jones, Day, Allen, Matthias

172 N.E. 307; 121 Ohio St. 628; 121 Ohio St. (N.S.) 628; 1930 Ohio LEXIS 339 (North Eastern Reporter)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Roden v. Hubbard (Ohio 1981)
Weigel v. Grossnickle (Ohio Ct. App. 1954)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

This cause came on to be heard upon the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and was submitted to the Court. Upon consideration whereof it is ordered by the Court that said petition be, and the same is, denied for the reason that the petitioner has an adequate remedy at law.

Writ denied.

Marshall, C. J., Kinkade, Robinson, Jones, Day and Allen, JJ., concur. Matthias, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.