State Ex Rel. Turner v. Marshall

Ohio Supreme Court
State Ex Rel. Turner v. Marshall, 176 N.E. 454 (Ohio 1931)
123 Ohio St. 586; 123 Ohio St. (N.S.) 586; 9 Ohio Law. Abs. 670; 1931 Ohio LEXIS 321
Allen, Jones, Matthias, Robinson, Day, Kinkade, Marshall

State Ex Rel. Turner v. Marshall

Opinion of the Court

Allen, J.

Tinder the ramification of the social and business interests conceded to exist between the judge of the court of common pleas and the defendants in the four actions covered by this record, any one, whether consciously or unconsciously, would have a natural inclination to prejudge the several cases. It is of vital importance that the litigant should believe that he will have a fair trial. The *588 facts set forth and conceded by the affidavits were sufficient to justify the plaintiffs in believing that they might not have such a trial. The writ will be allowed.

Writ allowed.

Jones, Matthias and Robinson, JJ., concur. Day and Kinkade, JJ., dissent. Marshall, C. J., not participating.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State, Ex Rel. Turner, v. Marshall, Chief Justice
Cited By
23 cases
Status
Published