Ohio Supreme Court, 1931

State Ex Rel. Fish v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 11, 1931 · Marshall, Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Robinson, Kinkade

177 N.E. 766; 123 Ohio St. 678; 123 Ohio St. (N.S.) 678; 1931 Ohio LEXIS 378 (North Eastern Reporter)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State Ex Rel. Karam v. Cull (Ohio 1942)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

During the course of the argument it developed that the Industrial Commission had not made such disposition of the matter as to permit relator to appeal to the common pleas court, and the cause was therefore held in abeyance to permit further proceedings before the Industrial Commission to obviate that difficulty. Since the submission of the cause in this court the Industrial Commission has granted the claimant a rehearing, and the cause has therefore become moot in this court. The relief prayed for must, therefore, be denied on authority of Miner v. Witt, 82 Ohio St., 237.

Writ denied.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen and Robinson, JJ., concur. Kinkade, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.