Ohio Supreme Court, 1932

Heigel v. Heigel

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 1, 1932 · Marshall, Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade, Stephenson

186 N.E. 99; 125 Ohio St. 638; 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 638; 1932 Ohio LEXIS 265 (North Eastern Reporter)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

In re Guardianship of Gausepohl (Ohio Ct. App. 1935)
Harbaugh v. Utz (Ohio Ct. App. 1958)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

It is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed upon the authority of Craig v. Welply, 104 Ohio St., 312, and Wells, Jr., v. Wells, 105 Ohio St., 471.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Stephenson, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.