Ohio Supreme Court, 1933

State Ex Rel. Vandenbark v. Whartenby

State Ex Rel. Vandenbark v. Whartenby
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 23, 1933 · Weygandt, Day, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Allen, Kinkade
185 N.E. 59; 126 Ohio St. 209; 126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 209; 1933 Ohio LEXIS 439 (North Eastern Reporter)

State Ex Rel. Vandenbark v. Whartenby

Opinion of the Court

This matter coming on to be heard upon the application of the relator for a writ of ouster, was argued by counsel and submitted to the court; upon consideration whereof, said application is denied, for the rea *210 son that under the record the evidence shows that Vandenbark had removed from the district, within the meaning of Section 4748, General Code, and the probate court, by virtue of Section 7610-1, General Code, had lawful right to fill such vacancy, as he did.

Writ denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Stephenson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. Allen and Kinkade, JJ., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.