Hummell v. Mercier

Ohio Supreme Court
Hummell v. Mercier, 190 N.E. 408 (Ohio 1934)
128 Ohio St. 49; 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 49; 1934 Ohio LEXIS 366
Weygandt, Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis, Zimmerman

Hummell v. Mercier

Opinion of the Court

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and. the same is hereby, affirmed on authority of Wyant v. Russell, 109 Ohio St., 167, for the reason that the record discloses that the Municipal Court of Sandusky rendered judgment as of May 25, 1932, which judgment was entered on the civil docket of that court as required by law and was not vacated, and the limitation for perfecting appeal ran from the judgment of May 25, 1932.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Hummell v. Mercier. (Two Cases.)
Status
Published