State Ex Rel. Richardson v. Industrial Commission
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Cupp (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2018)
- State v. Cupp (Ohio 2018)
- Gammage v. State (Tex. App. 1982)
- State ex rel. Buehler Food Markets, Inc. v. Industrial Commission (Ohio 1980)
- Wetzel v. Ohio (Supreme Court of the United States 1962)
- State Ex Rel. Bd. of Edn. v. State Bd. of Edn. (Ohio Ct. App. 1959)
- State ex rel. Board of Education v. State Board of Education (Ohio Ct. App. 1959)
- State v. Brewer (N.H. 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This cause came on to be heard upon the petition for mandamus and the demurrer thereto, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the demurrer ■ be, and the same hereby is, sustained for the reason that the Industrial Commission having found that the provision of Section 60 of the Code of Specific Requirements, with reference to building construction work, relating to openings in floors, was not applicable to the facts in the proceeding wherein the claimant sought additional compensation for violation of a spe *571 cific requirement, the decision of the Industrial Commission upon such questions of fact is final. Slatmeyer v. Industrial Commission, 115 Ohio St., 654, 155 N. E., 484, proposition one of the syllabus. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the writ of mandamus prayed for be, and the same hereby is, denied.
Writ denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.