Cincinnati Goodwill Industries v. Neuerman
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- Michigan-Ohio-Indiana Coal Assn. v. Nigh (Ohio 1936)
- Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Hauk (Ohio Ct. App. 1943)
- J. & F. Harig Co. v. City of Cincinnati (Ohio Ct. App. 1938)
- Price v. McCoy Sales & Service, Inc. (Ohio 1965)
- DiLoreto v. Shellenberger (Ohio Ct. App. 1960)
- Gray v. Youngstown Municipal Ry. Co. (Ohio 1954)
- Jolley v. Martin Bros. Box Co. (Ohio 1952)
- Green v. Acacia Mutual Life Ins. (Ohio 1951)
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Schmitt (Ohio Ct. App. 1945)
- Bridge v. Metropolitan Life Ins. (Ohio 1944)
- Marietta v. Nichol (Ohio Ct. App. 1942)
- Murphy v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. (Ohio 1936)
- State v. Huntsman (Ohio 1969)
- Hurt v. Charles J. Rogers Transportation Co. (Ohio 1953)
- McClanahan v. Koviak (Ohio Ct. App. 1939)
- Ryan v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. (Ohio Ct. App. 1937)
- Lucke v. Robison & Co. (Ohio Ct. App. 1937)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
It appears from the record that the trial court overruled motions of the defendant for a directed verdict, as well as' a motion for judgment contra verdict, and granted a motion for a new trial. Thereupon defendant prosecuted error to the Court of Appeals, which dismissed the petition in error and cross-petition in error for the reason that there was no judgment or final order in the Court of Common Pleas.
The Court of Appeals granted an order to certify the record on the ground of conflict with Toney v. Jenhins, 47 Ohio App., 248, 191 N. E., 828, and Union Gas & Electric Co. v. Hill, 49 Ohio App., 20, 194 N. E., 884.
*335 On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of said Court of Appeals be, and the same hereby is, reversed and the cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for the reason that the action of the trial court in overruling the motions of defendant for a directed verdict and for judgment contra verdict and granting the motion for a new trial constituted a final order from which error may be prosecuted. Therefore the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction. Jacob Laub Baking Co. v. Middleton, 118 Ohio St., 106, 160 N. E., 629; Chris Boll Hardware Co. v. Logan Brick Supply Co., 84 Ohio St., 455, 95 N. E., 1144; Davis v. Turner, 69 Ohio St., 101, 68 N. E., 819.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.