Ohio Supreme Court, 1936

State Ex Rel. Roshon v. Auble

State Ex Rel. Roshon v. Auble
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 4, 1936 · Weygandt, Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day, Zimmerman
200 N.E. 507; 130 Ohio St. 485; 130 Ohio St. (N.S.) 485; 5 Ohio Op. 102; 1936 Ohio LEXIS 368 (North Eastern Reporter)

State Ex Rel. Roshon v. Auble

Opinion of the Court

This cause came on to be heard upon the motion of the relator for judgment on the pleadings, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged that the petition be dismissed at the costs of the respondents, it appearing from the pleadings and statement of counsel that the relator is entitled to the office, has been appointed to the office since this proceeding was instituted, is now in office, and the respondents are not contesting his incumbency.

Petition dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.