Ohio Supreme Court, 1939

State Ex Rel. Slovensky v. Taylor

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 5, 1939 · Weygandt, Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers

21 N.E.2d 990; 135 Ohio St. 601; 135 Ohio St. (N.S.) 601; 14 Ohio Op. 531; 1939 Ohio LEXIS 267 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

In re Appeal of Smith (Ohio Ct. App. 1965)
State ex rel. Barborak v. Hunston (Ohio 1962)
State, Ex Rel. Flittner v. Baldwin (Ohio Ct. App. 1958)
State Ex Rel. Higgins v. George (Ohio 1946)
State Ex Rel. Boyd v. Schneider (Ohio 1946)
State Ex Rel. Franz v. Taylor (Ohio 1940)
State, Ex Rel. v. Taylor, Dir. (Ohio 1939)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*602 By the 'Court.

Upon examination of the pertinent statutes of Ohio relating to civil service, a majority of the court is of the opinion that one receiving a provisional appointment under Section 486-14, General Code, in the absence of an eligible list, becomes an appointee in the classified service within the contemplation of Section 486-8 (b), General Code, entitled to retain his position during good behavior and efficient service,-until the establishment of an eligible list, or until his services are terminated by arriving at the mandatory retirement age, or until the abolishment of the position, or a lay-off.,

Being in the classified service, he may not be summarily dismissed; his removal is governed by-Section 486-17a, General Code.

The demurrer to the petition is overruled and, it being agreed that such determination is dispositive of the case, the writ is allowed.

Writ allowed.

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams and Myers, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.