Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 1939

State Ex Rel. Baird v. Schroy

State Ex Rel. Baird v. Schroy
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 23, 1939 · Day, Hart, Matthias, Myers, Weygandt, Williams, Zimmerman
19 N.E.2d 644; 135 Ohio St. 94; 135 Ohio St. (N.S.) 94; 13 Ohio Op. 442; 1939 Ohio LEXIS 370 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. W.E. Pardee and Messrs. Burch Baird , for appellant. Mr. Wade DeWoody , director of law, and Mr. Harold L. Mull , for appellees.

State Ex Rel. Baird v. Schroy

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

By Section 109 of the amended charter, the people of Akron protected persons holding positions pursuant to appointment from eligible lists and those who had been continuously in the service in the same position for three years preceding the effective date of the amendments. The appellant did not come within either of those requirements, and therefore the judgment of'the Court of Appeals should be, and is, affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.