State Ex Rel. Frye v. MacConkey

Ohio Supreme Court
State Ex Rel. Frye v. MacConkey, 26 N.E.2d 457 (Ohio 1940)
136 Ohio St. 462; 136 Ohio St. (N.S.) 462; 17 Ohio Op. 31; 1940 Ohio LEXIS 557
Weygandt, Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias, Hart

State Ex Rel. Frye v. MacConkey

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

A writ of mandamus will not lie to control judicial discretion. Section 12285, Q-eneral Code.

A writ of prohibition cannot be invoked as a substitute for an appeal and will not be issued to prevent an anticipated erroneous judgment. State, ex rel. Norris, v. Hodapp, Judge, 135 Ohio St., 26, 18 N. E. (2d), 984, and authorities cited therein.

Demurrer to petition sustained and writs denied.

Writs denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State, Ex Rel. Frye, Exr., v. MacConkey, Probate Judge
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published