Ohio Supreme Court, 1942

In re Estate of Tyler

In re Estate of Tyler
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 29, 1942 · Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman
43 N.E.2d 265; 140 Ohio St. 333; 140 Ohio St. (N.S.) 333; 23 Ohio Op. 546; 1942 Ohio LEXIS 450 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Thomas J. Herbert , attorney general, Mr. Perry L. Graham and Mr. W.H. Middleton, Jr. , for appellant. Messrs. Squire, Sanders Dempsey, Mr. Clan Crawford and Mr. Mark A. Loofbourrow , for appellees.

In re Estate of Tyler

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

During the oral argument of this case upon its merits counsel for appellees directed the attention of the court to the fact that the record con *335 tained no bill of exceptions. Leave was granted counsel for appellant to perfect the record. Subsequently a supplemental record was filed containing the motion to dismiss the appeal to tbo Court of Appeals, the petition to reinstate the appeal in that court, with exhibits consisting of correspondence, and another copy of the -former transcript of docket and journal entries in the Court of Appeals. Thereafter counsel for appellees filed a motion to affirm the judgment entered by the Court of Appeals on September 29, 1941, on the ground that a bill of exceptions was necessary for a review.

As there is no bill of exceptions showing what was before the Court of Appeals in the way of evidence or admissions of counsel, this court is unable to determine the basis upon which the Court of Appeals refused to reinstate the appeal in that court.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed

Judgment affirmed.

'Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.