State Ex Rel. Fulton v. Halliday
Cases that cite this one
31 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- State Ex Rel. Petro v. Gold (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
- State v. Moyar, Unpublished Decision (11-13-2006) (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
- McCabe v. Ransom, Unpublished Decision (6-9-2006) (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
- Roberts v. Hutton (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
- Abraham v. BP Exploration & Oil, Inc. (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
- Rossman v. Conran (Ohio Ct. App. 1988)
- Moyer v. Robinson (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)
- Barry v. Barry (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
- PNC Bank, N.A. v. Craig (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
- Household Fin. Indus. Loan Co. of Iowa v. Pierce (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
- Pflum v. Waggoner (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
- Shumate v. City of Gahanna, Unpublished Decision (3-20-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
- Pennant Moldings, Inc. v. C & J Trucking Co. (Ohio Ct. App. 1983)
- Bednarz v. Henderson Family Ents, Ltd. (Ohio Ct. App. 2026)
- State v. I.T. (Ohio Ct. App. 2024)
- Lloyd v. Thornsbery (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
- Niepsuj v. Stoner (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
- Downey v. 610 Morrison Road, L.L.C., 07ap-903 (7-15-2008) (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
- Prater v. Dashkovsky, 07ap-389 (12-18-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
- Kukla v. Field Energy Servs., Inc., Unpublished Decision (6-21-2006) (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
- State v. England, Unpublished Decision (9-29-2006) (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
- Hardy v. Belmont Correctional Institution, Unpublished Decision (6-29-2006) (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
- Sherman v. Sherman, Unpublished Decision (5-11-2006) (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
- Brown v. Lincoln Nat. Life Ins., Unpublished Decision (5-20-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
- Charvat v. Oasis Mtg., Unpublished Decision (6-5-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The record before this court does not contain proof sufficient to sustain the petition to vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The proceedings of a trial court are deemed correct unless error affirmatively appears on the face of the record. Makranczy v. Gelfand, Admr., 109 Ohio St., 325, 142 N. E., 688.
Assuming the second petition to vacate was filed within limitation, all issues presented thereby had been *550 finally determined in the proceeding under the former petition to vacate.
’ There is nothing in the present record to establish that appellant Robert W. Halliday had not had an adjudication by a Court of Appeals composed of qualified and disinterested judges.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.