Ohio Supreme Court, 1944

State Ex Rel. Fulton v. Halliday

State Ex Rel. Fulton v. Halliday
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 23, 1944 · Weygandt, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Bell, Williams, Turner
53 N.E.2d 521; 142 Ohio St. 548; 142 Ohio St. (N.S.) 548; 27 Ohio Op. 487; 1944 Ohio LEXIS 482 (North Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

State Ex Rel. Fulton v. Halliday

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The record before this court does not contain proof sufficient to sustain the petition to vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The proceedings of a trial court are deemed correct unless error affirmatively appears on the face of the record. Makranczy v. Gelfand, Admr., 109 Ohio St., 325, 142 N. E., 688.

Assuming the second petition to vacate was filed within limitation, all issues presented thereby had been *550 finally determined in the proceeding under the former petition to vacate.

’ There is nothing in the present record to establish that appellant Robert W. Halliday had not had an adjudication by a Court of Appeals composed of qualified and disinterested judges.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Bell, Williams and Turner, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.