In Re Ames

Ohio Supreme Court March 28, 1951

In Re Ames, 98 N.E.2d 2 (Ohio 1951)

155 Ohio St. 184; 155 Ohio St. (N.S.) 184; 44 Ohio Op. 161; 1951 Ohio LEXIS 554

Weygandt, Zimmerman, Middleton, Matthias, Hart, Stewart, Taft, Levenson, Ohio

Opinion

*185 Per Curiam.

The remedy for review of errors or irregularities in the conduct of a criminal trial or sentence after, conviction is by appeal and not by habeas corpus, where the committing court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and the person. Ex parte Van Hagan. 25 Ohio St., 426; In re Whitmore, 137 Ohio St., 313, 29 N. E. (2d), 363; In re Burson, 152 Ohio St., 375, 89 N. E. (2d), 651.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Middleton, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur. Stewart and Taft, JJ., concur in the judgment for the reasons stated in the concurring opinion in In re Levenson, 154 Ohio St., 278.

Reference

Full Case Name: Ex Parte Ames
Cited By: 3 cases
Status: Published