In re Pullins
Ohio Supreme Court
In re Pullins, 155 Ohio St. (N.S.) 171 (Ohio 1951)
Hart, Levenson, Matthias, Middleton, Ohio, Stated, Stewart, Taft, Weygandt, Zimmerman
In re Pullins
Opinion of the Court
A proceeding in habeas corpus cannot be used to review alleged errors or irregularities in the proceedings or sentence of a court of competent jurisdiction. Ex parte Shaw, 7 Ohio St., 81; Ex parte Van Hagan, 25 Ohio St., 426; In re Allen, 91 Ohio St., 315, 326, 110 N. E., 535; State, ex rel. Drexel, v. Alvis, Warden, 153 Ohio St., 244, 91 N. E. (2d), 22. An adequate remedy at law is afforded by way of review on appeal when the trial court had jurisdiction of the person and subject matter. In re Whitmore, 137 Ohio
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Reference
- Status
- Published