Skirvin v. Board of Tax Appeals
Skirvin v. Board of Tax Appeals
Opinion of the Court
Although a majority of the members of this court are of the opinion that Sections 5356 and
Section 2, Article IV of the Constitution, provides in part: “No law shall be held unconstitutional and void by the Supreme Court without the concurrence of at least all but one of the judges, except in the affirm-, anee of a judgment of the Court of Appeals declaring a law unconstitutional and void.” The instant cases do not involve a judgment of that court declaring a law unconstitutional.
Five members of this court not being a sufficient number to declare Sections 5356 and 1078-36, General Code, unconstitutional, the real property in question is exempt from taxation.
Decision affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In re Application for Exemption from Taxation of Real Property of Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority: Skirvin v. Board of Tax Appeals, Appellees Strauss v. Board of Tax Appeals
- Status
- Published