Ohio Supreme Court, 1952

State ex rel. Clement v. Grzezinski

State ex rel. Clement v. Grzezinski
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 4, 1952 · Hart, Matthias, Middleton, Stewart, Taft, Weygandt, Zimmerman
158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 22

State ex rel. Clement v. Grzezinski

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The sole question presented to this court for determination is whether the Court of Appeals was in error in assessing one-half the costs to each the relator, and the respondent.

Section 12296, General Code, gives to the court discretion in assessing costs, and the record in the instant case does not disclose an abuse of that discretion.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Taft, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.