David v. Peck
David v. Peck
Opinion of the Court
It is admitted by appellant “that a
Compliance with the specific and mandatory provision of Section 5611, General Code, that “the notice of such appeal shall set forth or shall have attached thereto and incorporated therein by reference, a true copy of the notice sent by the commissioner to the taxpayer of the final determination complained of,” is essential to confer jurisdiction on the Board of Tax Appeals.
The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals dismissing the appeal on the ground of failure to comply with the mandatory jurisdictional statutory requirement is not unreasonable or unlawful. Kent Provision Co., Inc., v. Peck, Tax Commr., 159 Ohio St., 84, 110 N. E. (2d), 776.
The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.
Decision affirmed.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. It is my opinion that attaching a copy of the final order to the notice of appeal which was filed with the Board of Tax Appeals constituted substantial compliance with Section 5611, General Code.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.