Ohio Supreme Court, 1956

Karl v. Frazier

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 11, 1956 · Been, Bell, Hart, Matthias, Raised, Stewart, Taft, That, Were, Weygandt, Zimmerman

164 Ohio St. (N.S.) 462

Opinion of the Court

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart and Bell, JJ., concur. Taft, J., concurs for the reason that the claimed constitutional questions could have been but were not raised in the Court of Appeals.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.