Rigg v. Correction Department
Rigg v. Correction Department
Opinion of the Court
The period from March 1950, when petitioner was declared a parole violator, to October 1955, when he was released from the Indiana State Prison, at wMch time he was restored to parole by respondent, cannot be counted as time toward the serving of Ms maximum sentence. Section 2965.21, Revised Code.
The action of the Pardon and Parole Commission in declaring petitioner to be a parole violator before the expiration of the maximum period of his sentence and before Ms final release by that commission is not reviewable in a habeas corpus
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.