Ohio Supreme Court, 1960

In re Huffines

In re Huffines
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 18, 1960 · Bell, Herbert, Matthias, Peck, Taet, Weygandt, Zimmerman
171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 9

In re Huffines

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

A legal charge was stated in the indictment. Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the other alleged errors or irregularities of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.