Ohio Supreme Court, 1960

In re Cato

In re Cato
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 18, 1960 · Bell, Herbert, Matthias, Peck, Taet, Weygandt, Zimmerman
171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 15

In re Cato

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged er*16rors or irregularities of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.